Episode 74 with Mischa Geracoulis is available on Human Rights Education Now!

Mischa Geracoulis is Outreach and Engagement Officer at Project Censored and Production Lead at The Censored Press. She contributes to the State of the Free Press yearbook, serves as a Project Judge, and authored Media Framing and the Destruction of Cultural Heritage (Routledge, 2025).Mischa is also a Global Press Freedom Expert and Index Respondent with Reporters Without Borders. Her work focuses on human rights, journalistic ethics, press freedom, and the preservation of cultural heritage. She holds an M.A. in Education and Media Studies and a B.A. in International Development with a concentration on the Southwest Asia and North Africa (SWANA) region. Her journalistic portfolio can be found at: https://muckrack.com/mischa-geracoulis/portfolio.

Episode 74 Summary

In this episode of Human Rights Education Now!, Mischa Geracoulis examines how human rights, journalism, and the preservation of cultural heritage intersect, focusing on the legacy of the Armenian genocide. She discusses how cultural erasure and historical silences cause ongoing human rights violations and how journalism documents these histories to resist erasure.

The conversation centers on cultural heritage as a human rights issue, focusing on Rafael Lemkin’s work and media narratives. Mischa’s discussion of “change-centered” journalism and the role of microhistories in amplifying marginalized voices links to Edward Said’s Orientalism and critiques of media and power.

Mischa describes her work with Project Censored, focusing on promoting critical media literacy and defending freedom of expression under Articles 19 and 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The episode centers on contemporary censorship, particularly political pressures on academic and journalistic freedom, and how media institutions shape or suppress truth.

The discussion concludes with a global perspective on the destruction of cultural heritage, including the case of Nagorno-Karabakh, and a call for educators to integrate critical media literacy and cultural heritage into human rights education. Mischa emphasizes that empowering individuals to critically analyze media and recognize whose voices are included or excluded is essential for advancing human rights in the modern world.


Topics discussed:

· Origins of Mischa Geracoulis’ work in human rights and journalism

· Armenian genocide and cultural erasure

· Journalism’s role in documenting human rights abuses

· Cultural heritage as a human rights issue

· Microhistories and change-centered journalism

· Edward Said’s Orientalism and media analysis

· Project Censored and media accountability

· Critical media literacy in human rights education

· Censorship, propaganda, and academic freedom

· Cultural destruction in Nagorno-Karabakh

· Educators’ role in preserving cultural heritage


Tags:

Human rights; Human rights education; Cultural heritage; Armenian genocide; Microhistories; Rafael Lemkin; Change-centered journalism; Edward Said; Orientalism; Project Censored; Critical media literacy; Armenian SSR; Nagorno-Karabakh; Journalism education; Daniel Ellsberg; Ben Bagdikian; Nelson Mandela; Gandhi

Full topic listing available for PDF download HERE.

Listen on our Buzzsprout podcast website HERE

All episodes of Human Rights Education Now! are available on:

Buzzsprout, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Deezer, PlayerFM, Pocket Casts, and the HRE USA website,

Thank you for supporting the Human Rights Education NOW! podcast!

HRE USA is a project of the Center for Transformative Action.

Episode 73 with Jane Williams is available on Human Rights Education Now!

Professor Emeritus Jane Williams has built a distinguished career spanning legal practice, government legal service, academia, and civil society activism. She played a pivotal role in securing legislation on the rights of the child in Wales and was instrumental in the campaign for a Welsh Youth Parliament. At Swansea University, she co-founded the Observatory on Human Rights of Children (now the Observatory on Human Rights and Social Justice) and the Children’s Legal Centre Wales. Her scholarship and advocacy focus on devolution, child law, and children’s rights, and she has pioneered pedagogical innovations, including trans-Atlantic Street Law collaborations and human rights–based research with children.

Observatory on Human Rights and Social Justice

Children’s Legal Centre Wales

ORCID ID

In Episode 73 of Human Rights Education Now!, Jane Williams reflects on the roots of her commitment to children’s rights, shaped by witnessing the impact of poverty on children’s lives and by her legal training. She discusses the challenges of advancing children’s rights within the legal profession and the transformative influence of the UK Human Rights Act.

A central focus of the conversation is the development of Wales’ Children’s Parliament and the Children’s and People’s Assembly of Wales, created in the context of devolution and informed by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Jane explains how these initiatives demonstrate the practical integration of children’s participation rights into democratic structures. She also describes the founding of the Observatory on Human Rights and Social Justice and the Children’s Legal Centre Wales, institutions dedicated to research, accountability, policy advocacy, curriculum reform, and embedding children’s rights into formal systems.

The discussion addresses ongoing challenges, including limited implementation of human rights education through” rights-based practice in classrooms, the impact of nationalism on attitudes toward migrant children, and the UK’s incomplete engagement with its colonial history. Drawing inspiration from historical figures such as Eglantyne Jebb and Janusz Korczak, Jane concludes by advocating a bold recommendation: abolishing the minimum voting age so that governments must listen to children as political actors.

Topics discussed:

  • Origins of Jane Williams’ work in children’s rights
  • Impact of poverty on children’s lives
  • Law as a pathway to children’s rights advocacy
  • Wales’ devolution and the creation of the Children’s Parliament
  • The role of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in Welsh reform
  • Integrating children’s rights into institutions and legal practice
  • Curriculum reform in Wales and human rights education
  • Nationalism, migrant children, and decolonizing legal education
  • Historical role models in children’s rights
  • Abolishing the minimum voting age as a strategy for advancing children’s rights

Full topic listing available for PDF download HERE.

Listen on our Buzzsprout podcast website HERE.

All episodes of Human Rights Education Now! are available on:

Buzzsprout, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Deezer, PlayerFM, Pocket Casts, and the HRE USA website,

Thank you for supporting the Human Rights Education NOW! podcast!

HRE USA is a project of the Center for Transformative Action.

What Should We Teach about Human Rights?

By Keith C. Barton, Professor of Curriculum and Instruction at Indiana University from Social Education 83(4), p. 212–216

Educators around the world have advocated for human rights to become a core element of students’ social and civic learning.  Although constitutional rights are typically the foundation for social studies and related subjects, human rights represent a universal and cosmopolitan vision, one that applies to citizens and non-citizens alike and is not restricted by national boundaries. Studying human rights can highlight our responsibilities to all fellow humans, not only those with whom we share national citizenship.

Human rights also point to a more stable foundation for safe, secure, and fulfilling lives. Constitutional protections can change with shifting political winds, and rights that once seemed secure can disappear when overturned in court, when leaders choose to interpret them in new ways, or when governments are overthrown. Although human rights have evolved over time (and continue to do so), and although their enforcement usually has less authority than national law, they nonetheless provide a societal vision that is more stable than the changing arena of national politics.

>> Read full article